Comments on: On Two-Faced Blogging http://www.cross-mediaentertainment.com/2007/05/on-two-faced-blogging/ An archive of the first few exciting years exploring this area... Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:28:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: christy http://www.cross-mediaentertainment.com/2007/05/on-two-faced-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-431 christy Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:47:44 +0000 http://www.cross-mediaentertainment.com/index.php/2007/05/31/on-two-faced-blogging/#comment-431 Yay! Go Amsterdam's Crossmedia missionary! :) Yay! Go Amsterdam’s Crossmedia missionary! :)

]]> By: monique de haas http://www.cross-mediaentertainment.com/2007/05/on-two-faced-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-430 monique de haas Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:36:20 +0000 http://www.cross-mediaentertainment.com/index.php/2007/05/31/on-two-faced-blogging/#comment-430 HI Christy, What an excellent piece... Just to clarify my.. sigh.. I am not an academic like christy. BUT I do tend to find it very very necesarry to have the terming debate.. My sigh is for reasons that I meet every day, people using the term crossmedia at every end and NOT willing to clarify what they mean by it. This pollutes the debate on what we are talking about. It is completely OK to have different opinions on what you think crossmedia is, BUT please either science AS WELL as industry CLARIFY what you mean. Don't dismiss this as another term you use to get other strategic goals set.. OK you will, as industry. And you will not clarify what you mean out of strategic reasons, maybe.. But if so, don't bother, you already missed out on the new ecology. Crossmedia is about transparancy as well. But please do not polute the necessary discussion of what crossmedia is all about. What happens if you dismiss the term.... the actuality of the immensive change in media (convergence, use, industry, technonology etc etc) will REMAIN! So just start talking and thinking about it and clarify what you mean if you use the word crossmedia.. BIG SIGH. Christy you are a light baken, for trying to be and stay pure about this! HI Christy,

What an excellent piece… Just to clarify my.. sigh..
I am not an academic like christy. BUT I do tend to find it very very necesarry to have the terming debate..

My sigh is for reasons that I meet every day, people using the term crossmedia at every end and NOT willing to clarify what they mean by it. This pollutes the debate on what we are talking about. It is completely OK to have different opinions on what you think crossmedia is, BUT please either science AS WELL as industry CLARIFY what you mean. Don’t dismiss this as another term you use to get other strategic goals set.. OK you will, as industry. And you will not clarify what you mean out of strategic reasons, maybe.. But if so, don’t bother, you already missed out on the new ecology. Crossmedia is about transparancy as well. But please do not polute the necessary discussion of what crossmedia is all about. What happens if you dismiss the term…. the actuality of the immensive change in media (convergence, use, industry, technonology etc etc) will REMAIN!
So just start talking and thinking about it and clarify what you mean if you use the word crossmedia.. BIG SIGH.

Christy you are a light baken, for trying to be and stay pure about this!

]]>